Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Feminists for a Day
I was able to attend the Republican National Convention the evening Palin spoke. It is old news by now that her speech was a masterful performance. What tickled me were the speeches before Palin's, which may or may not have been covered by news outlets. I had no idea that Republican operatives were such feminists. Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, and Rudy Giuliani talked about sexism. They were appalled that Palin was being criticized and pointed to a double standard that male politicians could be fathers aspiring for high office without being criticized for being bad parents. Move over Gloria Steinem, Meg, Rudy, and Carly have your back. It is fascinating that feminism is now back in the public discourse because of Republican rhetoric! But it really is a return to social feminism. Yes, they advocated that women have the right to participate in the public square but also embraced traditional gender relations. It is a backward vision. Palin did not present herself as anything but a Mom, a tough hockey Mom, but a Mom nontheless.
McCain's Advisors
I attended a conference at the Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota, "America's Future:Conversations about Politics and Policy" during the RNC last week. Many of the presenters during the four-day conference are current advisors to John McCain. I know there has been a great deal of speculation about McCain's approach to foreign policy. Will he make a rightward shift in the same way he has on domestic policy? Or, will his foreign policy be less ideologically driven and more realistic? If the sessions I attended on the future of foreign policy are any indication, McCain's approach will be the latter. I learned last week that many of McCain's top foreign policy advisors held posts in the George H.W. Bush administration and tend toward realism. Even Obama has praised the first Bush's foreign policy. Indeed, compared to the aggressiveness of the current administration, McCain's policy advisors seem downright left-wing. Most were reluctant to impose a Western worldview on the world and criticized current policies. The only McCain advisor with ties to the current administration, Rob Portman, U.S. Trade Representative, is a staunch free trader but very moderate. If there was any running theme of the sessions it was a blind faith in the power of free markets. They are Republicans, after all. Still, the comments were measured, thoughtful, and backed up with research and experience. If McCain is elected president, I don't think we have as much to fear on the foreign policy front. Domestic policy is another matter.
It was very clear to me after listening to luminaries such as Joseph Liberman, R. James Woolsey, Rob Portman, and Henry Kissinger that foreign policy will no longer be part of a political calculation but instead will return to careerists in the State Department. And I predict that Joe Liberman will be Secretary of State in a McCain administration.
If Rob Portman, Joe Liberman, Henry Kissinger and others are active surrogates for McCain during the next couple of months, Obama will have some explaining to do about his foreign policy goals and will be hard-pressed to make clear distinctions between his approach and McCain's.
It was very clear to me after listening to luminaries such as Joseph Liberman, R. James Woolsey, Rob Portman, and Henry Kissinger that foreign policy will no longer be part of a political calculation but instead will return to careerists in the State Department. And I predict that Joe Liberman will be Secretary of State in a McCain administration.
If Rob Portman, Joe Liberman, Henry Kissinger and others are active surrogates for McCain during the next couple of months, Obama will have some explaining to do about his foreign policy goals and will be hard-pressed to make clear distinctions between his approach and McCain's.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Protests and the RNC
I was very involved in several events related to the Republican National Convention in St. Paul and even managed to attend the convention on Wednesday and Thursday night. I was the guest of the Republican National Committee! So, there is a lot to report. I'll try to post a part of the story each day this week.
First, I want to weigh in on the protests during the convention. The arrests of so-called anarchists has been reported. Unfortunately, the actions of a few people intent on destroying property (I saw broken windows at one of the downtown department stores and a sheriff's vehicle had a broken window) and their subsequent arrests has dominated the media coverage. What a shame. The protest against the war in Iraq on September 1 was not covered. An "Iraq Veterans Against the War" group marched along with families of veterans. Several people held photographs of loved ones who were killed or wounded during the war. With the exception of Cindy Sheehen, who was also in St. Paul at a Ralph Nadar rally, the families of soldiers and veterans actively protesting against the war have largely been ignored. I can tell you that their presence in the march was something to see, and it is terribly unfortunate that more attention hasn't been paid to soldiers who are actively against the war. The protest marchers were incredibly diverse, old and young and people of all races. A group a women wearing burkas participated. Some people brought their kids. I wish more attention was paid to this in the national media.
There were reports that members of the Connecticut delegation were harassed by protesters. Frankly, I don't see how that was possible. There were barricades everywhere so that anyone without credentials couldn't get close to any entrance. Since I had a pass on Wednesday and Thursday, I was able to move around and get a clear sense of where people without credentials could and could not go. A protest space closest to the convention center was reserved for people engaging in a counter protest with signs saying "Support our Troops." There was definitely a double standard when it came to issuing permits. The protest route was quite circumscribed to the point that we seemed to be marching in a circle.
From what I saw, I believe the so-called violence during the convention was exaggerated. I know there were a couple of incidents in Minneapolis that I did not witness, but people need to know that the protests on Monday and Thursday nights near the convention site in St. Paul were very well organized. Volunteers from the ACLU and Lawyers Guild were present to insure that people were treated fairly.
All I can say is that you should have seen the riot gear the police and members of the National Guard had on. They were loaded for anarchists. I was standing near a group of police officers at one point and looked over to see that each person had a gun, a taser, a pellet gun, a tear gas gun, pepper spray, a night stick, and plastic handcuffs. With all of the protective gear they had on as well, I was surprised they could move.
I witnessed an officer using pepper spray, and, in my opinion, his use of anything was unnecessary. Yes, a few people dressed ominously in black with their faces covered tipped over newspaper stands and threw debris in the street, but I don't think that form of acting out warranted arrests or defensive action.
First, I want to weigh in on the protests during the convention. The arrests of so-called anarchists has been reported. Unfortunately, the actions of a few people intent on destroying property (I saw broken windows at one of the downtown department stores and a sheriff's vehicle had a broken window) and their subsequent arrests has dominated the media coverage. What a shame. The protest against the war in Iraq on September 1 was not covered. An "Iraq Veterans Against the War" group marched along with families of veterans. Several people held photographs of loved ones who were killed or wounded during the war. With the exception of Cindy Sheehen, who was also in St. Paul at a Ralph Nadar rally, the families of soldiers and veterans actively protesting against the war have largely been ignored. I can tell you that their presence in the march was something to see, and it is terribly unfortunate that more attention hasn't been paid to soldiers who are actively against the war. The protest marchers were incredibly diverse, old and young and people of all races. A group a women wearing burkas participated. Some people brought their kids. I wish more attention was paid to this in the national media.
There were reports that members of the Connecticut delegation were harassed by protesters. Frankly, I don't see how that was possible. There were barricades everywhere so that anyone without credentials couldn't get close to any entrance. Since I had a pass on Wednesday and Thursday, I was able to move around and get a clear sense of where people without credentials could and could not go. A protest space closest to the convention center was reserved for people engaging in a counter protest with signs saying "Support our Troops." There was definitely a double standard when it came to issuing permits. The protest route was quite circumscribed to the point that we seemed to be marching in a circle.
From what I saw, I believe the so-called violence during the convention was exaggerated. I know there were a couple of incidents in Minneapolis that I did not witness, but people need to know that the protests on Monday and Thursday nights near the convention site in St. Paul were very well organized. Volunteers from the ACLU and Lawyers Guild were present to insure that people were treated fairly.
All I can say is that you should have seen the riot gear the police and members of the National Guard had on. They were loaded for anarchists. I was standing near a group of police officers at one point and looked over to see that each person had a gun, a taser, a pellet gun, a tear gas gun, pepper spray, a night stick, and plastic handcuffs. With all of the protective gear they had on as well, I was surprised they could move.
I witnessed an officer using pepper spray, and, in my opinion, his use of anything was unnecessary. Yes, a few people dressed ominously in black with their faces covered tipped over newspaper stands and threw debris in the street, but I don't think that form of acting out warranted arrests or defensive action.
Friday, August 22, 2008
My Blue Heaven
In 2006 I made a commitment to do whatever I could to turn the Midwest blue.
I worked on Amy Klobuchar's campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota and contributed to the campaigns of rising political stars Sherrod Brown in Ohio and Claire McCaskill in Missouri--I was able to attend a McCaskill rally in Kansas City featuring Barack Obama. All three candidates won in 2006 and have solid progressive voting records. You can check their voting records on govtrack.us. The Midwest is where Democratic leaders are coming from these days. We can't quit now. Minnesota is considered a purple state, with a Republican and a Democrat in the Senate and a Republican governor. Of course, as you know, Missouri and Ohio are also considered important swing states.
2008 is our chance to change the political landscape in the Midwest. That is one reason why I am working for Al Franken for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. I met Al Franken at a "Women for Franken" event in St. Paul last week. Of course, I knew he was funny, but I came away from that meeting with a positive impression of his grasp of the issues and his commitment to social change and political reform. I am also more enthusiastic about working for Franken now that he has hired Stephanie Schriock, a Hillary supporter and former chief of staff for Montana Senator Jon Tester, as his new campaign manager, and has hired Natalie Volin from the DFL Feminist Caucus to work with him on policy issues. At the event he implied that Natalie was giving him more guidance and information on women's issues. The crowd of about fifty women seemed to be similarly impressed. I was standing with a group of academics (we can be pretty cynical and critical) who all seemed to be on board.
It is going to be a very close race; current polls have incumbent Republican Norm Coleman with a slight lead. I'm sure he will get a slight bounce with the Republican convention in St. Paul and an even bigger bounce if Minnesota's Governor Tim Pawlenty is McCain's VP pick. Coleman is also help from outside interest groups, especially from a mysterious group spending millions of dollars for anti-union political ads that are currently running in Maine and Minnesota. See the August 21 article in the New York Times. Coleman has adopted a Roveian campaign strategy. In other words, his is going negative with simplistic ads that attack Franken's character. So, it will be an up hill battle to elect Al. I'll be working in the campaign office, helping with fundraising, and registering voters in South Minneapolis. Both Franken and Obama need record voter turn out in the Twin Cities to win in Minnesota.
I'll keep you posted on the campaign.
I worked on Amy Klobuchar's campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota and contributed to the campaigns of rising political stars Sherrod Brown in Ohio and Claire McCaskill in Missouri--I was able to attend a McCaskill rally in Kansas City featuring Barack Obama. All three candidates won in 2006 and have solid progressive voting records. You can check their voting records on govtrack.us. The Midwest is where Democratic leaders are coming from these days. We can't quit now. Minnesota is considered a purple state, with a Republican and a Democrat in the Senate and a Republican governor. Of course, as you know, Missouri and Ohio are also considered important swing states.
2008 is our chance to change the political landscape in the Midwest. That is one reason why I am working for Al Franken for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. I met Al Franken at a "Women for Franken" event in St. Paul last week. Of course, I knew he was funny, but I came away from that meeting with a positive impression of his grasp of the issues and his commitment to social change and political reform. I am also more enthusiastic about working for Franken now that he has hired Stephanie Schriock, a Hillary supporter and former chief of staff for Montana Senator Jon Tester, as his new campaign manager, and has hired Natalie Volin from the DFL Feminist Caucus to work with him on policy issues. At the event he implied that Natalie was giving him more guidance and information on women's issues. The crowd of about fifty women seemed to be similarly impressed. I was standing with a group of academics (we can be pretty cynical and critical) who all seemed to be on board.
It is going to be a very close race; current polls have incumbent Republican Norm Coleman with a slight lead. I'm sure he will get a slight bounce with the Republican convention in St. Paul and an even bigger bounce if Minnesota's Governor Tim Pawlenty is McCain's VP pick. Coleman is also help from outside interest groups, especially from a mysterious group spending millions of dollars for anti-union political ads that are currently running in Maine and Minnesota. See the August 21 article in the New York Times. Coleman has adopted a Roveian campaign strategy. In other words, his is going negative with simplistic ads that attack Franken's character. So, it will be an up hill battle to elect Al. I'll be working in the campaign office, helping with fundraising, and registering voters in South Minneapolis. Both Franken and Obama need record voter turn out in the Twin Cities to win in Minnesota.
I'll keep you posted on the campaign.
Stephanie Tubbs Jones
I am sure you were as shocked I was by the news of the death of Ohio Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones. I signed the online guestbook sponsored by the Cleveland Plain Dealer with a note about seeing her speak at a Clinton rally at the University of Pennsylvania the day before the Pennsylvania primary. As a former Ohio resident and confirmed Buckeye, I was excited to see her. She was amazing! She had the most dynamic presence of anyone I have seen in politics. I can't believe she's gone. Below is a note about Tubbs Jones from Hillary Clinton. I'm sure Clinton will refer to her good friend in her speech at next week's Democratic National Convention.
Dear Kathleen, Yesterday, we lost a colleague, a friend, an inspiration, and a champion for all of us. I am deeply saddened by the death of Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones. She was my friend and my sister. She made me laugh, smile and fired up my spirit when I needed it most. She had a light that shone for the world to see within her and a fighting spirit safely stowed behind her disarming smile. Stephanie had so much integrity and a fiery intelligence that enabled her to become a one-woman force for progress in our country. Stephanie was a tireless worker, giving a voice to the voiceless and always combating injustice. Stephanie spent much of her life fighting for all Americans and to ensure that everyone had the most precious right - the right to vote. All of us who were lucky enough to know her and love her can only strive to be as much like her as we can -- to be as passionate, as loyal, as hard-charging, and as joyful every single day. Stephanie was one of a kind, and we will miss our friend forever. My family's deepest condolences are with Stephanie's son, Mervyn, her family, and her many loved ones, friends, supporters, and her beloved Ohioans. It is during this tough time that we look back and remember all the memories and blessings that Stephanie brought into our lives. If you have a thought, a story, a prayer, or condolences you would like to share, you can visit our website today so we can rejoice together in the friendship and love that we have for Stephanie. All the notes and memories we gather will be sent to her family on behalf of our extended family.
Dear Kathleen, Yesterday, we lost a colleague, a friend, an inspiration, and a champion for all of us. I am deeply saddened by the death of Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones. She was my friend and my sister. She made me laugh, smile and fired up my spirit when I needed it most. She had a light that shone for the world to see within her and a fighting spirit safely stowed behind her disarming smile. Stephanie had so much integrity and a fiery intelligence that enabled her to become a one-woman force for progress in our country. Stephanie was a tireless worker, giving a voice to the voiceless and always combating injustice. Stephanie spent much of her life fighting for all Americans and to ensure that everyone had the most precious right - the right to vote. All of us who were lucky enough to know her and love her can only strive to be as much like her as we can -- to be as passionate, as loyal, as hard-charging, and as joyful every single day. Stephanie was one of a kind, and we will miss our friend forever. My family's deepest condolences are with Stephanie's son, Mervyn, her family, and her many loved ones, friends, supporters, and her beloved Ohioans. It is during this tough time that we look back and remember all the memories and blessings that Stephanie brought into our lives. If you have a thought, a story, a prayer, or condolences you would like to share, you can visit our website today so we can rejoice together in the friendship and love that we have for Stephanie. All the notes and memories we gather will be sent to her family on behalf of our extended family.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Devoted Hillary Supporters Plan Actions at the DNC
One of my friends from the Clinton campaign sent along this post. I've received calls from friends asking me to go to Denver and participate in events organized by Hill'raisers. I can't go to Denver because my fall semester begins on August 25, but I would be reluctant to do anything divisive in any case.
Plans for Clinton convention rallies intensify
By Bob Cusack
Posted: 08/10/08 11:37 PM [ET]
Frustrated supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) are planning multiple rallies at the Democratic convention in Denver, coupled with television and print advertisements.
The disenchanted Democrats want to express their disappointment with the party’s presidential primary process.
");
//-->
The Denver Group, formed a couple of months ago by two Clinton backers, says it has filmed a television commercial and is looking to air it soon. The fledgling group adds that it has received such a strong response to its scheduled Aug. 26 reception in Denver that it had to book an overflow room.
Meanwhile, another pro-Clinton group called “18 Million Voices” is organizing a march on Aug. 26 in Denver “and nationwide to support Sen. Clinton and advocate for women’s rights worldwide.” It will also be holding “a celebration in a beautiful Denver City park during the day, and throughout the evening on Aug. 26,” according to the 18 Million Voices website.
Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) campaign has been in contact with Clinton aides to come up with a plan that will unify the party as well as honor Clinton and the roughly 18 million people who voted for her during the presidential primary.
But any compromise is unlikely to satisfy Clinton’s most ardent backers.
For example, some of the Denver Group’s goals are contrary to the Democratic Party’s. Its goals include: an open convention; Clinton's name placed in nomination with no symbolic roll call vote; speeches allowed by supporters of Clinton on behalf of her candidacy; a genuine roll call vote with Clinton as a legitimate candidate; and “no coronation.”
Asked about Clinton last week, Obama said, “As is true in all conventions, we’re still working out the mechanics, the coordination.” When pressed if he would favor a roll call for Clinton, Obama responded, “I didn’t say that.”
Heidi Li Feldman, co-founder of the Denver Group, said, “There is going to be a steady stream of activities for the first three days of the convention” and predicted thousands of Clinton backers will appear at the events.
Feldman said her group has raised between $30,000 and $40,000, enabling it to buy six print ads and produce one television ad. The TV ad is scheduled to run on CNN and during a local news broadcast in Denver the week before the convention begins. The ad strategy for convention week has not been finalized.
[The Denver Group is planning on advertising in The Hill.]
One print ad that ran in Congressional Quarterly showed a picture of Franklin Roosevelt and asked, “Would Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi have kept his name off the ballot?”
The ad noted that Roosevelt went into the 1932 Democratic convention short of the necessary delegates to clinch the nomination and subsequently won on the 4th ballot.
Regardless of any accord Clinton and Obama come to, the planned rallies could become a focus of the media’s attention instead of the heavily scripted themes of the convention.
The Denver Post recently reported that Clinton backers will hold signs that read, “Denounce Nobama's Coronation.”
Clinton and many of her backers believe that, if there is a strategy of recognizing the New York senators’ delegates at the convention, it would be a cathartic experience and lead to a more unified Democratic Party.
During a recent fundraiser in California, Clinton stressed that Democrats must unite behind Obama and said talks are ongoing with the Obama campaign and Democratic National Committee about her role and the role of her delegates.
Clinton, whose appearance at the fundraiser was posted on YouTube, did point out that putting her name in nomination and a roll call vote “are the usual kind of process that occurs at conventions.”
Feldman said many Clinton supporters “were reassured and relieved” by the former first lady’s remarks, especially after a media account reported that she had asked not to be nominated at the convention.
Clinton is expected to address the convention on Aug. 26 while her husband, former President Bill Clinton, will speak the next night.
Marc Rubin, the other co-founder of the Denver Group, said Clinton supporters will “absolutely not” be appeased by the speaking slots.
Rubin said there is “palpable anger” at the Democratic National Committee.
Jenny Backus, spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee Convention, said the party has become more unified and cited Clinton’s strong support of Obama as the strongest signal of that unity.
“Sen. Clinton is one of our biggest assets,” Backus said.
While Obama and Clinton have said their bitter primary battle is behind them, there is still animosity between the supporters of the two senators.
The person who posted the Clinton You Tube video indicated that he or she had disabled some viewer comments, stating on the site that “Obama trolls have started to post horrible negative comments regarding Hillary Clinton and her supporters.”
Meanwhile, Feldman said she has received nasty e-mails since launching the Denver Group. Feldman, who is a college professor, said one e-mail she received at work was reported to the FBI.
Feldman said she is not disgruntled or bitter, but she has an objection to the Democratic Party’s process. And she stressed that she will not be voting for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) this fall.
“It would be a tragedy for Democrats to lose this year,” Feldman said.
Share this story
Plans for Clinton convention rallies intensify
By Bob Cusack
Posted: 08/10/08 11:37 PM [ET]
Frustrated supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) are planning multiple rallies at the Democratic convention in Denver, coupled with television and print advertisements.
The disenchanted Democrats want to express their disappointment with the party’s presidential primary process.
");
//-->
The Denver Group, formed a couple of months ago by two Clinton backers, says it has filmed a television commercial and is looking to air it soon. The fledgling group adds that it has received such a strong response to its scheduled Aug. 26 reception in Denver that it had to book an overflow room.
Meanwhile, another pro-Clinton group called “18 Million Voices” is organizing a march on Aug. 26 in Denver “and nationwide to support Sen. Clinton and advocate for women’s rights worldwide.” It will also be holding “a celebration in a beautiful Denver City park during the day, and throughout the evening on Aug. 26,” according to the 18 Million Voices website.
Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) campaign has been in contact with Clinton aides to come up with a plan that will unify the party as well as honor Clinton and the roughly 18 million people who voted for her during the presidential primary.
But any compromise is unlikely to satisfy Clinton’s most ardent backers.
For example, some of the Denver Group’s goals are contrary to the Democratic Party’s. Its goals include: an open convention; Clinton's name placed in nomination with no symbolic roll call vote; speeches allowed by supporters of Clinton on behalf of her candidacy; a genuine roll call vote with Clinton as a legitimate candidate; and “no coronation.”
Asked about Clinton last week, Obama said, “As is true in all conventions, we’re still working out the mechanics, the coordination.” When pressed if he would favor a roll call for Clinton, Obama responded, “I didn’t say that.”
Heidi Li Feldman, co-founder of the Denver Group, said, “There is going to be a steady stream of activities for the first three days of the convention” and predicted thousands of Clinton backers will appear at the events.
Feldman said her group has raised between $30,000 and $40,000, enabling it to buy six print ads and produce one television ad. The TV ad is scheduled to run on CNN and during a local news broadcast in Denver the week before the convention begins. The ad strategy for convention week has not been finalized.
[The Denver Group is planning on advertising in The Hill.]
One print ad that ran in Congressional Quarterly showed a picture of Franklin Roosevelt and asked, “Would Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi have kept his name off the ballot?”
The ad noted that Roosevelt went into the 1932 Democratic convention short of the necessary delegates to clinch the nomination and subsequently won on the 4th ballot.
Regardless of any accord Clinton and Obama come to, the planned rallies could become a focus of the media’s attention instead of the heavily scripted themes of the convention.
The Denver Post recently reported that Clinton backers will hold signs that read, “Denounce Nobama's Coronation.”
Clinton and many of her backers believe that, if there is a strategy of recognizing the New York senators’ delegates at the convention, it would be a cathartic experience and lead to a more unified Democratic Party.
During a recent fundraiser in California, Clinton stressed that Democrats must unite behind Obama and said talks are ongoing with the Obama campaign and Democratic National Committee about her role and the role of her delegates.
Clinton, whose appearance at the fundraiser was posted on YouTube, did point out that putting her name in nomination and a roll call vote “are the usual kind of process that occurs at conventions.”
Feldman said many Clinton supporters “were reassured and relieved” by the former first lady’s remarks, especially after a media account reported that she had asked not to be nominated at the convention.
Clinton is expected to address the convention on Aug. 26 while her husband, former President Bill Clinton, will speak the next night.
Marc Rubin, the other co-founder of the Denver Group, said Clinton supporters will “absolutely not” be appeased by the speaking slots.
Rubin said there is “palpable anger” at the Democratic National Committee.
Jenny Backus, spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee Convention, said the party has become more unified and cited Clinton’s strong support of Obama as the strongest signal of that unity.
“Sen. Clinton is one of our biggest assets,” Backus said.
While Obama and Clinton have said their bitter primary battle is behind them, there is still animosity between the supporters of the two senators.
The person who posted the Clinton You Tube video indicated that he or she had disabled some viewer comments, stating on the site that “Obama trolls have started to post horrible negative comments regarding Hillary Clinton and her supporters.”
Meanwhile, Feldman said she has received nasty e-mails since launching the Denver Group. Feldman, who is a college professor, said one e-mail she received at work was reported to the FBI.
Feldman said she is not disgruntled or bitter, but she has an objection to the Democratic Party’s process. And she stressed that she will not be voting for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) this fall.
“It would be a tragedy for Democrats to lose this year,” Feldman said.
Share this story
Monday, August 11, 2008
Hillary's Web Chat
Hi all--
I've returned to my blog to post comments from Hillary's live web chat with supporters last week. You might be interested in the exchange.
FYI: I'll be reporting more consistently now that the conventions are almost underway.
I'll report on the protests at the Republican National Convention, of course, but will also let you know how Hillary's ardent supporters react to the Democratic National Convention. I'm sure I'll here from them. Also, look for a post this week on the Franken campaign--I'm attending a "Women for Franken" event in St. Paul on Wednesday to talk about the issues.
Here is the web chat post:
I want to thank everyone for joining me here today for our live chat. I'm so grateful to all of my online friends for the amazing support you continue to show me. Your kind words mean so much to me, and you have been instrumental in working to help retire our campaign debt. I'll never forget all you've done for me. It has been great getting back to work in the Senate for the people of New York. And now that the Senate is in recess, I'm very excited about getting back out on the campaign trail to help elect Barack Obama and grow our Democratic majorities in Congress. With the Democratic convention coming up, the excitement and curiosity is certainly starting to build. I want to assure you that Senator Obama and I are working together to make sure it's a big success. We will ensure that the voices of everyone who participated in this historic process are respected and our party is fully unified heading into the November election. While no decisions have been made yet, I will make sure that we keep you up to date and involved with all of the Convention activity. It means so much to me to know that no matter what the coming months and years bring, you'll be working right by my side. With your help, 2008 is going to be a great year for Democrats.
Now let's chat! Click here to ask me question or comment below and let's get started!
Editor's Note: Please continue to refresh the page to see all the latest questions and answers. We are experiencing high traffic and receiving lots of great questions! It may take some time for your comment to appear. Please do not re-post your comment.
Editor's Update: We started taking questions last night.
Question #1: What are you working on now? by Emily (via email)
Answer: A lot! Tomorrow, I am hitting the campaign trail for Senator Obama in Las Vegas, Nevada for a voter registration rally. I have talked so many people about the current economic situation, and what we can do to make the economy work for middle class families again. We have to deal with the cost of energy, both gas and home heating fuel. As you know, I believe we should have a Strategic Energy Fund to invest in developing alternative fuels, and I've now introduced legislation to help families deal with rising prices for home heating oil. Education costs are another concern: I'm glad to report that Congress just passed the Higher Education Opportunity Act, which includes several provisions from the Student Borrowers Bill of Rights I introduced to protect students and their families. And I'm working closely with business and elected leaders in New York to support projects around the state and it has been great to be back in New York again.
I'm especially proud of the work I've been doing with my friend Senator Patty Murray to stop the Bush administration from further restricting women's access to birth control. They're trying to redefine certain types of birth control as abortion, and it could prevent women from getting the care they need. I know many of my online supporters have been a big help on this issue, and I really appreciate it. And earlier this week , I called for an investigation into disturbing reports about inadequate response to sexual assaults by the Department of Defense . I'm going to keep working on the issues you and I talked about so much during the campaign -- ending the war in Iraq, making universal health care a reality, achieving energy independence, creating new green jobs, and putting the economy back to work for the middle class again. I'm continuing to work on the issues that matter to the people of New York and helping my constituents in any way I can.
Question #2: What goals do you have for yourself during the next four years both professionally and personally? by Carole (via email)
Answer: My goals include being the best Senator I can be, and to go on fighting every day for the issues I care about, helping America’s working families, and ensuring a better future for every child. I believe in the next fours years, we must ensure every American has healthcare, and our economy once again works for middle class families. As the war in Iraq comes to an end, we must restore America’s relations with our allies and our leadership around the world. I will continue to be an advocate for our troops and our veterans.
I look forward to working with President Obama on these important challenges, working to rebuild a government that once again works for the people, follows the rule of law and respects the constitution.
Question #3:
Hello Mrs. Clinton
My name is Ivanna Pincilotti and I am 16 years old from Davis, CA. First of all I want to say that you’re my hero and an inspiration to me. You are strong, powerful, and an undefeated woman in my option. You have opened so many doors for girls like me such as becoming president. I have two questions to ask you Mrs. Clinton. The first one is I want to go into law one day as my major what is the best piece of information you can give me? The second one is what wanted you to go into politics?
by Ivanna at 8/7/2008 11:54:51 AM
Answer: Thank you so much, Ivanna, for writing in. I have met so many wonderful young people all across this country who are so active and engaged in politics. It so important that young people get involved and stay involved because you are the future. As you look toward law school, learn all you can about the American constitution, which has served this country so well with its system of checks and balances and protecting the rights of every individual. My path in politics grew out of my commitment to public service and helping others. I realized that I could be most effective in helping to make a difference by becoming an elected official. It was actually a young woman who urged me to "Dare to compete." That is a piece of advice I now pass on to you.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:27:12 PM
Questions #4:
Hey Hillary you are such a great person I went to a rally of yours during the primary in New Hampshire & did some campaigning for you here in albany ny you put a smile on my face every time I saw you whether in person or on tv. You are a strong women don't give up keep fighting for whats right. I hope our country can take a new step in the right direction once Barack Obama is president. I want to say if he does ask you to be his VP you should and you would make a great vice president Mrs. Clinton:) God Bless Larry D. Albany ny
by lawrenced78 at 8/7/2008 12:14:54 PM
Answer: I have said repeatedly that I will do whatever Senator Obama asks me to do. I am really focused and enjoying being back in the Senate and working on behalf of my New York constituents. This is Senator Obama’s decision and his alone and I am going to respect the privacy of that process by not discussing it.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:38:11 PM
Question #5:
One of the main reasons that I voted for Hillary is her plans for healthcare. Can you make a comment on how healthcare carried out in the next administration?
by RichardA OH at 8/7/2008 12:02:43 PM
Answer: I am so pleased that Senator Obama shares my commitment to universal health care. Once he is elected, I will be working closely with his administration, members of Congress, health care advocates, and others -- to help develop a plan that ensures access to health care for every American. I know how important this issue is and it will be my top priority.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:45:10 PM
Question #6
Special thanks to you for your leadership in the birth control issue! What is the prospect for the paid family leave bill the house is taking up?
by HoustonAnne at 8/7/2008 12:11:28 PM
Answer: Thanks for your comment on birth control - as you know HHS is considering draft regulations that would restrict access to birth control. Many of you have joined me in opposing this act and we are continuing to monitor this situation closely. I am a strong supporter of extending the Family and Medical Leave Act which has made such a difference for millions of Americans. I was very pleased that the House voted to adopt paid leave for families and hope we can get action in the Senate. This is a good example of smart, pro-family policies we need - helping working families meet their responsibilities at work and at home.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:02:23 PM
Question #7
Hey Hillary,
My 12 year old daughter and I are sitting here, waiting anxiously, for each reply. Love you!!!!!!
by k12kyle at 8/7/2008 12:39:24 PM
Answer: Thank you, I was so pleased to read your comment. I remember when Chelsea was 12 and what a special time it was. I hope both of you continue to stay engaged and perhaps we can meet along the trail.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:09:10 PM
Question #8
As a college student (one of your biggest student supporters; Go Hillary!) I am wondering what you and Senator Obama feel is the best course of action to deal with rising tuition costs and continued cuts to the higher education budget. (It's gotten really bad here in California-thousands of teachers losing their jobs, tuition costs rising, funding disappearing).
Thanks so much Hillary!! And thanks for your facebook page, i love it! And one final note: COME TO CAL STATE FULLERTON!! WE LOVE YOU!! :)
Richard H., 19, Temecula, CA
by lunchtableguy at 8/7/2008 12:18:29 PM
Answer: Senator Obama and I agree it is so important that we make sure that college education is affordable. Our country needs more educated young people if we are going to meet the challenges before us. Congress has just passed the Higher Education Bill which includes a number of proposals including several that I sponsored as part of a Student Borrower's Bill of Rights. We should be doing more to increase funding to increase Pell Grants and other financial support. I also believe we should reduce student loan repayment for students who enter public service.
P.S. Glad you like my Facebook page!
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:12:05 PM
Question #9
Are you truly supporting Senator Obama and encouraging your supporters to do the same or are you just saying what you have to?
by JR4Hill at 8/7/2008 12:46:53 PM
Answer: Let me first say, I am so grateful for all the support that I have received. To answer your question, I am completely committed to helping Senator Obama become the next President of the United States and urging all of you to do the same. We share a commitment to universal healthcare, bringing an end to the war in Iraq, and getting back to an economy that works for working families again. I believe so strongly that if we want to see real progress in our country and finally break away from the failed policies of the past eight years, we need a Democrat in the White House. I am going to continue to do whatever I can to help Senator Obama and Democrats across the country win in the November.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:15:38 PM
Question #10
As a college student who is participating in his first presidential election, your candidacy really brought to my attention to and energized me about the great things that can be accomplished through our political process. Now that, unfortunately, your candidacy is over, and since you (reading your biography) were able to accomplish so much during your collegiate years: What would you suggest college-aged Americans do to become more involved in the American politcal system, aside from voting?
by ChrisMIA at 8/7/2008 12:42:12 PM
Answer: Thank you, I am always glad to hear from young people who want to stay active in politics. I so appreciated your enthusiasm and energy throughout this campaign. This is a great time to be active in politics at every level. Every campaign I know is looking for volunteers who can help with reaching out to voters, and I can tell you that personal contact is so effective. I suggest you look at the campaigns that are taking place near you and sign up for one. The friends you make in these early campaigns are likely to stay with you throughout your whole life.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:18:49 PM
Question #11
Good Morning Senator Clinton: Thank you for taking time to chat with your supporters. Is there any possibility of your name being placed in nomination for President at the convention? This would at least give your supporters a voice in the choice for the party's nominee.
by alrd1950 at 8/7/2008 12:07:51 PM
Answer: I know that there have been a lot of questions on this subject. Senator Obama and I share the goal of ensuring that the voices of everyone who participated in this historic process are respected. I want to assure everyone that we are working together with Senator Obama's campaign and the DNC, and I am confident we will have a successful and unified Convention in Denver.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:21:17 PM
Question #12
Hillary, I hope that we will be able to talk with you at the Convention in Denver! Please consider meeting with us -- YOUR supporters!
by ginamc at 8/7/2008 12:31:24 PM
Answer: And, I love Texas! I am looking forward to seeing and talking with as many people as I can during the Convention. I will have a very busy schedule, and I am really looking forward to it. Thank you so much for your continued support.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:24:04 PM
Thank you for sharing some time with me today and for the great questions -- I'm sorry I couldn't get to all of them! This was a lot of fun, and I hope we can do it again soon.
And thank you again for all your support. I can't tell you enough how much I appreciate all that you do for me. I'm hitting the campaign trail tomorrow in Nevada for Senator Obama - stay tuned and let's stay in touch!
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:27:12 PM
Discuss (534 comments)
I've returned to my blog to post comments from Hillary's live web chat with supporters last week. You might be interested in the exchange.
FYI: I'll be reporting more consistently now that the conventions are almost underway.
I'll report on the protests at the Republican National Convention, of course, but will also let you know how Hillary's ardent supporters react to the Democratic National Convention. I'm sure I'll here from them. Also, look for a post this week on the Franken campaign--I'm attending a "Women for Franken" event in St. Paul on Wednesday to talk about the issues.
Here is the web chat post:
I want to thank everyone for joining me here today for our live chat. I'm so grateful to all of my online friends for the amazing support you continue to show me. Your kind words mean so much to me, and you have been instrumental in working to help retire our campaign debt. I'll never forget all you've done for me. It has been great getting back to work in the Senate for the people of New York. And now that the Senate is in recess, I'm very excited about getting back out on the campaign trail to help elect Barack Obama and grow our Democratic majorities in Congress. With the Democratic convention coming up, the excitement and curiosity is certainly starting to build. I want to assure you that Senator Obama and I are working together to make sure it's a big success. We will ensure that the voices of everyone who participated in this historic process are respected and our party is fully unified heading into the November election. While no decisions have been made yet, I will make sure that we keep you up to date and involved with all of the Convention activity. It means so much to me to know that no matter what the coming months and years bring, you'll be working right by my side. With your help, 2008 is going to be a great year for Democrats.
Now let's chat! Click here to ask me question or comment below and let's get started!
Editor's Note: Please continue to refresh the page to see all the latest questions and answers. We are experiencing high traffic and receiving lots of great questions! It may take some time for your comment to appear. Please do not re-post your comment.
Editor's Update: We started taking questions last night.
Question #1: What are you working on now? by Emily (via email)
Answer: A lot! Tomorrow, I am hitting the campaign trail for Senator Obama in Las Vegas, Nevada for a voter registration rally. I have talked so many people about the current economic situation, and what we can do to make the economy work for middle class families again. We have to deal with the cost of energy, both gas and home heating fuel. As you know, I believe we should have a Strategic Energy Fund to invest in developing alternative fuels, and I've now introduced legislation to help families deal with rising prices for home heating oil. Education costs are another concern: I'm glad to report that Congress just passed the Higher Education Opportunity Act, which includes several provisions from the Student Borrowers Bill of Rights I introduced to protect students and their families. And I'm working closely with business and elected leaders in New York to support projects around the state and it has been great to be back in New York again.
I'm especially proud of the work I've been doing with my friend Senator Patty Murray to stop the Bush administration from further restricting women's access to birth control. They're trying to redefine certain types of birth control as abortion, and it could prevent women from getting the care they need. I know many of my online supporters have been a big help on this issue, and I really appreciate it. And earlier this week , I called for an investigation into disturbing reports about inadequate response to sexual assaults by the Department of Defense . I'm going to keep working on the issues you and I talked about so much during the campaign -- ending the war in Iraq, making universal health care a reality, achieving energy independence, creating new green jobs, and putting the economy back to work for the middle class again. I'm continuing to work on the issues that matter to the people of New York and helping my constituents in any way I can.
Question #2: What goals do you have for yourself during the next four years both professionally and personally? by Carole (via email)
Answer: My goals include being the best Senator I can be, and to go on fighting every day for the issues I care about, helping America’s working families, and ensuring a better future for every child. I believe in the next fours years, we must ensure every American has healthcare, and our economy once again works for middle class families. As the war in Iraq comes to an end, we must restore America’s relations with our allies and our leadership around the world. I will continue to be an advocate for our troops and our veterans.
I look forward to working with President Obama on these important challenges, working to rebuild a government that once again works for the people, follows the rule of law and respects the constitution.
Question #3:
Hello Mrs. Clinton
My name is Ivanna Pincilotti and I am 16 years old from Davis, CA. First of all I want to say that you’re my hero and an inspiration to me. You are strong, powerful, and an undefeated woman in my option. You have opened so many doors for girls like me such as becoming president. I have two questions to ask you Mrs. Clinton. The first one is I want to go into law one day as my major what is the best piece of information you can give me? The second one is what wanted you to go into politics?
by Ivanna at 8/7/2008 11:54:51 AM
Answer: Thank you so much, Ivanna, for writing in. I have met so many wonderful young people all across this country who are so active and engaged in politics. It so important that young people get involved and stay involved because you are the future. As you look toward law school, learn all you can about the American constitution, which has served this country so well with its system of checks and balances and protecting the rights of every individual. My path in politics grew out of my commitment to public service and helping others. I realized that I could be most effective in helping to make a difference by becoming an elected official. It was actually a young woman who urged me to "Dare to compete." That is a piece of advice I now pass on to you.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:27:12 PM
Questions #4:
Hey Hillary you are such a great person I went to a rally of yours during the primary in New Hampshire & did some campaigning for you here in albany ny you put a smile on my face every time I saw you whether in person or on tv. You are a strong women don't give up keep fighting for whats right. I hope our country can take a new step in the right direction once Barack Obama is president. I want to say if he does ask you to be his VP you should and you would make a great vice president Mrs. Clinton:) God Bless Larry D. Albany ny
by lawrenced78 at 8/7/2008 12:14:54 PM
Answer: I have said repeatedly that I will do whatever Senator Obama asks me to do. I am really focused and enjoying being back in the Senate and working on behalf of my New York constituents. This is Senator Obama’s decision and his alone and I am going to respect the privacy of that process by not discussing it.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:38:11 PM
Question #5:
One of the main reasons that I voted for Hillary is her plans for healthcare. Can you make a comment on how healthcare carried out in the next administration?
by RichardA OH at 8/7/2008 12:02:43 PM
Answer: I am so pleased that Senator Obama shares my commitment to universal health care. Once he is elected, I will be working closely with his administration, members of Congress, health care advocates, and others -- to help develop a plan that ensures access to health care for every American. I know how important this issue is and it will be my top priority.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 12:45:10 PM
Question #6
Special thanks to you for your leadership in the birth control issue! What is the prospect for the paid family leave bill the house is taking up?
by HoustonAnne at 8/7/2008 12:11:28 PM
Answer: Thanks for your comment on birth control - as you know HHS is considering draft regulations that would restrict access to birth control. Many of you have joined me in opposing this act and we are continuing to monitor this situation closely. I am a strong supporter of extending the Family and Medical Leave Act which has made such a difference for millions of Americans. I was very pleased that the House voted to adopt paid leave for families and hope we can get action in the Senate. This is a good example of smart, pro-family policies we need - helping working families meet their responsibilities at work and at home.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:02:23 PM
Question #7
Hey Hillary,
My 12 year old daughter and I are sitting here, waiting anxiously, for each reply. Love you!!!!!!
by k12kyle at 8/7/2008 12:39:24 PM
Answer: Thank you, I was so pleased to read your comment. I remember when Chelsea was 12 and what a special time it was. I hope both of you continue to stay engaged and perhaps we can meet along the trail.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:09:10 PM
Question #8
As a college student (one of your biggest student supporters; Go Hillary!) I am wondering what you and Senator Obama feel is the best course of action to deal with rising tuition costs and continued cuts to the higher education budget. (It's gotten really bad here in California-thousands of teachers losing their jobs, tuition costs rising, funding disappearing).
Thanks so much Hillary!! And thanks for your facebook page, i love it! And one final note: COME TO CAL STATE FULLERTON!! WE LOVE YOU!! :)
Richard H., 19, Temecula, CA
by lunchtableguy at 8/7/2008 12:18:29 PM
Answer: Senator Obama and I agree it is so important that we make sure that college education is affordable. Our country needs more educated young people if we are going to meet the challenges before us. Congress has just passed the Higher Education Bill which includes a number of proposals including several that I sponsored as part of a Student Borrower's Bill of Rights. We should be doing more to increase funding to increase Pell Grants and other financial support. I also believe we should reduce student loan repayment for students who enter public service.
P.S. Glad you like my Facebook page!
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:12:05 PM
Question #9
Are you truly supporting Senator Obama and encouraging your supporters to do the same or are you just saying what you have to?
by JR4Hill at 8/7/2008 12:46:53 PM
Answer: Let me first say, I am so grateful for all the support that I have received. To answer your question, I am completely committed to helping Senator Obama become the next President of the United States and urging all of you to do the same. We share a commitment to universal healthcare, bringing an end to the war in Iraq, and getting back to an economy that works for working families again. I believe so strongly that if we want to see real progress in our country and finally break away from the failed policies of the past eight years, we need a Democrat in the White House. I am going to continue to do whatever I can to help Senator Obama and Democrats across the country win in the November.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:15:38 PM
Question #10
As a college student who is participating in his first presidential election, your candidacy really brought to my attention to and energized me about the great things that can be accomplished through our political process. Now that, unfortunately, your candidacy is over, and since you (reading your biography) were able to accomplish so much during your collegiate years: What would you suggest college-aged Americans do to become more involved in the American politcal system, aside from voting?
by ChrisMIA at 8/7/2008 12:42:12 PM
Answer: Thank you, I am always glad to hear from young people who want to stay active in politics. I so appreciated your enthusiasm and energy throughout this campaign. This is a great time to be active in politics at every level. Every campaign I know is looking for volunteers who can help with reaching out to voters, and I can tell you that personal contact is so effective. I suggest you look at the campaigns that are taking place near you and sign up for one. The friends you make in these early campaigns are likely to stay with you throughout your whole life.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:18:49 PM
Question #11
Good Morning Senator Clinton: Thank you for taking time to chat with your supporters. Is there any possibility of your name being placed in nomination for President at the convention? This would at least give your supporters a voice in the choice for the party's nominee.
by alrd1950 at 8/7/2008 12:07:51 PM
Answer: I know that there have been a lot of questions on this subject. Senator Obama and I share the goal of ensuring that the voices of everyone who participated in this historic process are respected. I want to assure everyone that we are working together with Senator Obama's campaign and the DNC, and I am confident we will have a successful and unified Convention in Denver.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:21:17 PM
Question #12
Hillary, I hope that we will be able to talk with you at the Convention in Denver! Please consider meeting with us -- YOUR supporters!
by ginamc at 8/7/2008 12:31:24 PM
Answer: And, I love Texas! I am looking forward to seeing and talking with as many people as I can during the Convention. I will have a very busy schedule, and I am really looking forward to it. Thank you so much for your continued support.
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:24:04 PM
Thank you for sharing some time with me today and for the great questions -- I'm sorry I couldn't get to all of them! This was a lot of fun, and I hope we can do it again soon.
And thank you again for all your support. I can't tell you enough how much I appreciate all that you do for me. I'm hitting the campaign trail tomorrow in Nevada for Senator Obama - stay tuned and let's stay in touch!
by Senator Clinton at 8/7/2008 1:27:12 PM
Discuss (534 comments)
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Update on Hillary Supporters
The "I Own My Vote" petition below is another effort to use Hillary Clinton's historic campaign for the White House as a means to accomplish permanent social and political changes. I have received a request to sign a petition calling for the Obama campaign and the DNC to recognize Clinton's contribution to the Democratic Party. I continue to be astonished at the extent of the political activity the Clinton campaign has inspired, especially among women. The petition seeks to formally recognize Clinton and her supporters. There is a concern that Clinton's supporters will be shut out to the convention process. I don't think this is just sour grapes or paranoia. I submitted an application to both the DNC and the local organzing committee in Denver in early March to volunteer at the convention as a Clinton supporter. My application was accepted, but, to date, I haven't received any confirmation that I will be given a volunteer assignment. Interesting.
On an alarming note, I also received a request today to contribute to a newspaper ad, "Hillary Supporters for McCain." YIKES. I will sign the "I Own My Vote" petition, but I will not support any effort to suggest that Hillary supporters vote for McCain.
Here is the "I Own My Vote" petition:
Bring us together by seating 100% of the Florida and Michigan delegations in Denver with 100% of their votes, allocated in accordance with the popular vote of each state.
Bring us together by adopting policies on the Platform Committee that Hillary Clinton has championed.
Bring us together through reform of the primary and caucus system to reflect the basic principle of one person/one vote.
Bring us together through outspoken denunciation of all gender bias, racism and other forms of discrimination.
Bring us together by fairly and respectfully including Hillary and her supporters at the Democratic National Convention in Denver by, among other things, placing her name in nomination for President, conducting a roll call vote, and providing her a prominent speaking role during prime time on August 26th, the 88th anniversary of women’s suffrage.
I own my vote. It does not belong to any party. It does not belong to any candidate. It does not belong to any mob that would impose its will on me. Only I can decide how to use my vote, and I can decide based on any criteria I choose. Therefore I pledge not to give my vote to anyone who does not earn it.
On an alarming note, I also received a request today to contribute to a newspaper ad, "Hillary Supporters for McCain." YIKES. I will sign the "I Own My Vote" petition, but I will not support any effort to suggest that Hillary supporters vote for McCain.
Here is the "I Own My Vote" petition:
Bring us together by seating 100% of the Florida and Michigan delegations in Denver with 100% of their votes, allocated in accordance with the popular vote of each state.
Bring us together by adopting policies on the Platform Committee that Hillary Clinton has championed.
Bring us together through reform of the primary and caucus system to reflect the basic principle of one person/one vote.
Bring us together through outspoken denunciation of all gender bias, racism and other forms of discrimination.
Bring us together by fairly and respectfully including Hillary and her supporters at the Democratic National Convention in Denver by, among other things, placing her name in nomination for President, conducting a roll call vote, and providing her a prominent speaking role during prime time on August 26th, the 88th anniversary of women’s suffrage.
I own my vote. It does not belong to any party. It does not belong to any candidate. It does not belong to any mob that would impose its will on me. Only I can decide how to use my vote, and I can decide based on any criteria I choose. Therefore I pledge not to give my vote to anyone who does not earn it.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Why Obama Should Choose Ed Rendell VP
Even though I signed the "Vote Both" petition, I don't think Obama will choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate. He should choose one of her strongest supporters, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, instead. Rendell's support for John Kerry in 2004 was the key to Kerry's victory in Pennsylvania in the general election against George Bush. Obama has to winPennsylvania to beat McCain, but his loss to Clinton in the primary does not bode well. I can tell you from first-hand experience that Obama is going to have a difficult time winninig PA. Obama's campaign could use Rendell's populism among working-class voters to win over that group.
It is also significant that Rendell was General Chairman of the Democratic Committee during the 2000 election. His connections within the DNC and his loyalty to Clinton make him the ideal unity candidate.
I know that Rendell has already announced that he is not interested in the VP spot, but he has been at the forefront of Democratic presidential politics for almost a decade and would be sorely tempted to join Obama's ticket.
It is also significant that Rendell was General Chairman of the Democratic Committee during the 2000 election. His connections within the DNC and his loyalty to Clinton make him the ideal unity candidate.
I know that Rendell has already announced that he is not interested in the VP spot, but he has been at the forefront of Democratic presidential politics for almost a decade and would be sorely tempted to join Obama's ticket.
Did Media Bias Cost Clinton the Nomination?
My friends from the Clinton campaign in New England are still sharing their feelings about the campaign and remain bitter about the result. Their bitterness is understandable, but we should also critically evaluate Clinton's campaign strategy. Media bias aside, the Clinton campaign made several costly miscalculations. Most importantly, the campaign did not make adjustments after Obama won several caucus states. In a previous post, I reported on a "Conversations with Hillary" event in Boston, where Hillary unapoligetically and defiantly defended her strategy to focus on populus "blue" states. I reported at the time that I belived this attitude would cost her the nomination.
Why didn't Clinton change her blue state stategy after Obama won the Iowa caucuses? She had plenty of time then to compete in remaining caucus states. I'm not sure why the campaign didn't treat Obama's victory in Iowa as a wake-up call and make adjustments. The great irony of the primary campaign is that Clinton had the support of a significant number of state and local officials across the country but did not effectively organize this support to ensure that her surrogates represented her in caucus meetings. For example, Massachusetts State Representative Ruth Balser went to a Maine caucus site to represent Clinton (In Maine you don't have to be a resident to speak at a caucus). The caucus meeting Ruth attended supported Hillary, but the Clinton campaign did not have surrogates at each caucus site, which might have made a difference. Clinton's losses in caucus states, to be sure, cannot be attributed to her campaign alone. The caucus process, I believe, disenfranchises women for two reasons. Firstly, caucuses require a time commitment that many women cannot make because of work and family responsibilities. Secondly, the debate-style caucus deliberation process can be intimidating. I reported in March that young, white male Obama volunteers were fairly aggressive in Maine. Did the Obama campaign silence women? I believe so.
Even Howard Dean conceded when he meet with a group of female elected officials from Massachusetts in early May that the caucus system was undemocratic. Dean told the group that one of his goals as DNC chair was to try to encourage all states to adopt an open primary system. It is my guess that one outcome of this past primary season will be the end of the caucus. Good riddance.
Another miscalculation was the decision to keep too many paid staff in the Northeast. (She also spent too much time in the Northeast. I know that she needed to come through Boston and New York to raise money, but she should have spent far more time in the Midwest before Super Tuesday). The campaign had a well-organized volunteer group led by elected officials throughout the Northeast, and, in my opinion, could have relied on volunteers to do the organizing in certain areas. She did not need five staff in Rhode Island. Maybe the campaign did not have the money to send staff to crucial primary states a month or two before each election, but I think that would have made a difference. Campaign offices in crucual primary states weren't set up early enough. She did so well despite this because she could rely on the field staff of governors supporting her. This was especially crucial in Ohio and Pennsylvania where she could rely on Governor Strickland and Rendell's political networks.
It is understandable that Hillary supporters remain angry about the sexism in full display during the past year. However, let's keep in mind that Clinton missed opportunities to turn things around. She refused to change her strategy or her message. It is tempting to make Hillary a victim but to do so ignores the power she had to make changes.
Why didn't Clinton change her blue state stategy after Obama won the Iowa caucuses? She had plenty of time then to compete in remaining caucus states. I'm not sure why the campaign didn't treat Obama's victory in Iowa as a wake-up call and make adjustments. The great irony of the primary campaign is that Clinton had the support of a significant number of state and local officials across the country but did not effectively organize this support to ensure that her surrogates represented her in caucus meetings. For example, Massachusetts State Representative Ruth Balser went to a Maine caucus site to represent Clinton (In Maine you don't have to be a resident to speak at a caucus). The caucus meeting Ruth attended supported Hillary, but the Clinton campaign did not have surrogates at each caucus site, which might have made a difference. Clinton's losses in caucus states, to be sure, cannot be attributed to her campaign alone. The caucus process, I believe, disenfranchises women for two reasons. Firstly, caucuses require a time commitment that many women cannot make because of work and family responsibilities. Secondly, the debate-style caucus deliberation process can be intimidating. I reported in March that young, white male Obama volunteers were fairly aggressive in Maine. Did the Obama campaign silence women? I believe so.
Even Howard Dean conceded when he meet with a group of female elected officials from Massachusetts in early May that the caucus system was undemocratic. Dean told the group that one of his goals as DNC chair was to try to encourage all states to adopt an open primary system. It is my guess that one outcome of this past primary season will be the end of the caucus. Good riddance.
Another miscalculation was the decision to keep too many paid staff in the Northeast. (She also spent too much time in the Northeast. I know that she needed to come through Boston and New York to raise money, but she should have spent far more time in the Midwest before Super Tuesday). The campaign had a well-organized volunteer group led by elected officials throughout the Northeast, and, in my opinion, could have relied on volunteers to do the organizing in certain areas. She did not need five staff in Rhode Island. Maybe the campaign did not have the money to send staff to crucial primary states a month or two before each election, but I think that would have made a difference. Campaign offices in crucual primary states weren't set up early enough. She did so well despite this because she could rely on the field staff of governors supporting her. This was especially crucial in Ohio and Pennsylvania where she could rely on Governor Strickland and Rendell's political networks.
It is understandable that Hillary supporters remain angry about the sexism in full display during the past year. However, let's keep in mind that Clinton missed opportunities to turn things around. She refused to change her strategy or her message. It is tempting to make Hillary a victim but to do so ignores the power she had to make changes.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Vote Both
I just signed a letter to Barack Obama urging him to choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate. Lanny Davis, a former member of Bill Clinton's administration, is leading this effort.
It seems that some Hill'raisers are shifting their attention to advocating for a "dream ticket." I think it is highly unlikely that Obama will choose a woman, especially Clinton. However, he needs to know that Clinton and the issues she represents mean a great deal to many Democratic Party activists. For more information, go to voteboth.com.
It seems that some Hill'raisers are shifting their attention to advocating for a "dream ticket." I think it is highly unlikely that Obama will choose a woman, especially Clinton. However, he needs to know that Clinton and the issues she represents mean a great deal to many Democratic Party activists. For more information, go to voteboth.com.
Sunday, June 8, 2008
I Played One on TV
I thought you might be interested to know that my efforts on behalf of Hillary Clinton included appearing in an ad urging the Democratic National Committee to seat the delegates from Michigan and Florida. I played a committed Democrat, hardly a stretch. My friends from Team Hillary, John and Jenny Doggett and Kathy Hughes, created a PAC to raise money for an ad that ran on CNN and during ABC News in the Washington, D.C. market. They were able to get studio space at the local cable station in Newton, MA for the shoot. I showed up just to lend support but ended up in the commerical. They were looking for regional diversity with my Midwestern accent! I couldn't believe these intrepid campaigners created a PAC and produced a commerical. That is really the story to tell. So many people involved in the campaign extended themselves in ways they probably couldn't have imagined a few months ago. The dedication of the people I volunteered with was so inspiring. It was such a priviledge to meet and work with such passionate and committed people. I learned so much from them.
Al Franken
Al Franken received the Democratic Farmer Labor Party nomination for U.S. Senate at the state convention in Rochester yesterday. Franken comes to the nomination with a lot of baggage, primarily his work as a satirist and comedian. My congresswoman, Betty McCollum, suggested that Franken would not be the best nominee for the State of Minnesota because of his long history of offensive comments and jokes, especially a piece he wrote for Playboy some years ago, and did not appear with him as he accepted the nomination. Senator Amy Klobucher, who remained neutral, did embrace Franken at the convention. Franken apologized in his acceptance speech, but he will have to continue to be contrite during the campaign. It is notable that the chair of the DFL Feminist Caucus resigned in protest. There could be trouble ahead. The Party leadership, of course, is predicting a victory in November, but I believe it will be a very close race because Republican Norm Coleman, the incumbent, has been distancing himself from the Bush administration for months.
I am going to turn my attention away from presidential politics to work for Al Franken. I am hoping that Hillary Clinton will be the next majority leader of the Senate.
I am going to turn my attention away from presidential politics to work for Al Franken. I am hoping that Hillary Clinton will be the next majority leader of the Senate.
I'm Not There Yet
I received an invitation to Hillary Clinton's concession speech yesterday in Washington, DC. I wish I could have been there to experience some sort of closure. Instead, I watched the speech from a live feed from the Clinton campaign. Clinton's gracious and inclusive speech really explains why I worked so hard for her in six states during the past five months. She mentioned gay and lesbian rights and women's rights with conviction, and she has a record of service to back up her statements. It was both heartbreaking and empowering to watch her yesterday.
My friends from Team Hillary have been emailing like mad these days, sharing their feelings about the outcome, and a few have made pronouncements about what they intend to do in November. A couple of friends are so angry with the Democratic National Committee that they changed their voter registration from Democrat to Independent. Some have made it clear that they are not voting for Obama, while others are urging unity.
I'm not there yet. I have already been inundated with emails from Howard Dean, the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Missouri Democrats, Sen. Sherrod Brown, (D-Ohio) and the Democratic Farmer Labor Party in Minnesota calling for unity and asking for contributions to Obama's campaign. I am using these opportunities to press the case for women's issues.
I want to see more discussion about the virulent sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure during the past year. The Democratic Party should not take my vote for granted.
My friends from Team Hillary have been emailing like mad these days, sharing their feelings about the outcome, and a few have made pronouncements about what they intend to do in November. A couple of friends are so angry with the Democratic National Committee that they changed their voter registration from Democrat to Independent. Some have made it clear that they are not voting for Obama, while others are urging unity.
I'm not there yet. I have already been inundated with emails from Howard Dean, the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Missouri Democrats, Sen. Sherrod Brown, (D-Ohio) and the Democratic Farmer Labor Party in Minnesota calling for unity and asking for contributions to Obama's campaign. I am using these opportunities to press the case for women's issues.
I want to see more discussion about the virulent sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure during the past year. The Democratic Party should not take my vote for granted.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
How We Are Fighting Back
WomenCount Pac placed a full-page ad in yesterday's New York Times emphasizing that Hillary Clinton is still very much alive in this race. I am proud to report that I was of the contributors for this ad. There is a spontaneous movement to confront the sexism behind the assumption that Obama will be the nominee. Groups across the country are creating websites and blogs and raising money to purchase ads. WomenCount is just one of many. I am working with a PAC in Newton, MA, CounttheVotes, to place ads in regional papers. Women are mobilizing to lend support to Hillary Clinton, whose campaign is becoming a feminist issue. I have pasted below a statement about the ad from WomenCount Pac and a letter by Dr. Lynette Long about the politics of race and gender. I could paste much more information, as I am receiving several notices a day about new efforts to fight back!
Team Hillary - please read the email below and if possible please send acontribution by following the directions below. Kay Khan _____ From: Susie Buell [mailto:susie@buellofficesf.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:38 PMTo: Belinda V. Munoz; Baribeau, ElizabethSubject: Today's New York Times, page 9 Dear WomenCount PAC Supporters: Have you seen the ad on page 9 in today's New York Times? It's been another HUGE day for WomenCount PAC and the work we're doing forHillary and her supporters around the country. Our "Not So Fast" ad ran thismorning in the New York Times, and once again the response has beenenormous. Already today the ad has been featured on The Today Show, GoodMorning America, and CNN. We have interviews lined up with ABC, FOX, andothers. It's all over the web and print press and the calls are still comingin. All of which ONCE AGAIN underscores the passion, the strength, and the sheerforce of the voices of women all around the country. Now, WE MUST NOT REST.We must continue to spread our message that every vote must be cast, andevery vote must be counted before this race is over. In addition to the NewYork Times, our ads have also run in USA Today and local papers throughoutKentucky and Oregon.We are currently working on new ads to run at the end of the week. We willkeep you updated about the content and placement of those ads. For now, weneed your support to keep our message going by supporting the costs of theseads. WILL YOU HELP US? PLEASE DIG DEEP AND CONTRIBUTE TO WOMENCOUNT PAC sowe can shout out to the world that our voices count and must be heard. Wehave attached a contribution form. Just print it out and fax it back withyour credit card information. It's so easy. You just need to do it! To contribute using a credit card, please fill out the attached form withyour signature and fax it back to: (415) 732-7701To contribute with a check: please make it payable to WomenCount PAC andsend it to:WomenCount PAC c/o: Megan AsmusThe Sutton Law Firm, PC 150 Post Street, Suite 405 , San Francisco, CA 94108t: (415) 248-7825; f: belindavm@buellofficesf.com Here's some more exciting news. Our web site is up!!!! Check outwww.womencountpac.com <http://www.womencountpac.com/> . Thank you for your continuing support for this very important effort.Last but not least, below is a letter by Dr. Long that we'd like to sharewith you. Read it if you want to be moved into action! (NOTE: The lastparagraph of this letter has been omitted.) From: Dr. Lynette LongFirst I want to thank each and every one of you for writing to me. I wantto apologize for sending a group email, but I got hundreds of letters. Iwant you to know you are not alone. There are millions of women who feel asyou do, that the Democratic National Primary Campaign uncovered thepervasive and insidious sexism that runs rampant through our country. ThatHillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate, and that she is beingcheated out of the nomination by the good old boys network, the DNC and theMainstream Media. You are angry. You are in a rage. I am too. Underneath that rage is sadness, sadness that we are second class citizensin a country where we are the majority. What's especially disquieting to meis that many young women are blind to the sexist nature of the world inwhich we live. It's our job, each and every one of us, to educate them.Economically, women earn seventy-seven cents on the dollar for the same workcompared to men. Women are in significantly fewer managerial positions, areless likely to own a business and more likely to live in poverty.Politically, women comprise fifty-two percent of the population and an evenen larger share of the voting public yet only sixteen of the current onehundred Untied States Senators are women. Similarly, only sixteen percentof the current members of the House of Representatives are women. There isonly one female Supreme Court Justice on a nine member court and mostremarkably America has never had a female president or presidential nominee.Women did not get the right to vote in the United States until 1920. Theglass ceiling is real on both economical and political fronts. Men wantparity for their daughters and granddaughters but not for the women sittingbeside them. They are not going to give us the power that should be ours,we have to take it. Are we ready? Women have no sense of their own power. White women are the largestrace/gender voting block in the country. White men compose the secondlargest voting block, black women the third largest block, and black men arethe smallest race/gender block. White and black women together womencomprise more than fifty percent of the electorate and if were fullycommitted to a single candidate, we could determine the outcome of anyoffice in the country. It is our turn. Are we ready? I am sad that black women do not support Hillary in greater numbers. Manymembers of the black community wrote to me and said they were afraid tostand up for Hillary. They explained how black radio is pressuring it'slisteners to vote for Barack Obama. White men and women alike wrote me andtold me that they were called racist for supporting Hillary Clinton. I wantto remind each and everyone of you that, in 1969, Shirley Chisholm the firstblack woman to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives said, "Of my twohandicaps, being female put more obstacles in my path than being black."The impact of the "handicaps" of race and gender has not changed in the last40 years. As women we need to come together, and take the power that couldbe ours. Racism and sexism are both terrible barriers, but one is notworse than the other. On average, a black man with a college degree earnsmore than a white woman with the same degree, and a black woman earns lessthan both. Black male physicians earn more than white women physicians, andblack male professors earn more than white female professors. Yet ninetypercent of black women voted for Barack Obama indifferent to the impact ofgender on their struggle or how electing a female president might help them. I want to change the world. I think we can. I think by electing femaleleaders we can create a gentler America. We need to be counted. We needto stand up and let the DNC know we will not get in line. As one woman whowrote me so eloquently put it, the DNC thinks we will vote for Obama becauselike abused women we have nowhere else to go. To be removed from this list, please send an e-mail with "remove" in thesubject line.The Office of Susie Tompkins Buell & Mark BuellP.O. Box 29921San Francisco, CA 94129-9921t: 415.248.7820 f: 415.441.6381
Team Hillary - please read the email below and if possible please send acontribution by following the directions below. Kay Khan _____ From: Susie Buell [mailto:susie@buellofficesf.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:38 PMTo: Belinda V. Munoz; Baribeau, ElizabethSubject: Today's New York Times, page 9 Dear WomenCount PAC Supporters: Have you seen the ad on page 9 in today's New York Times? It's been another HUGE day for WomenCount PAC and the work we're doing forHillary and her supporters around the country. Our "Not So Fast" ad ran thismorning in the New York Times, and once again the response has beenenormous. Already today the ad has been featured on The Today Show, GoodMorning America, and CNN. We have interviews lined up with ABC, FOX, andothers. It's all over the web and print press and the calls are still comingin. All of which ONCE AGAIN underscores the passion, the strength, and the sheerforce of the voices of women all around the country. Now, WE MUST NOT REST.We must continue to spread our message that every vote must be cast, andevery vote must be counted before this race is over. In addition to the NewYork Times, our ads have also run in USA Today and local papers throughoutKentucky and Oregon.We are currently working on new ads to run at the end of the week. We willkeep you updated about the content and placement of those ads. For now, weneed your support to keep our message going by supporting the costs of theseads. WILL YOU HELP US? PLEASE DIG DEEP AND CONTRIBUTE TO WOMENCOUNT PAC sowe can shout out to the world that our voices count and must be heard. Wehave attached a contribution form. Just print it out and fax it back withyour credit card information. It's so easy. You just need to do it! To contribute using a credit card, please fill out the attached form withyour signature and fax it back to: (415) 732-7701To contribute with a check: please make it payable to WomenCount PAC andsend it to:WomenCount PAC c/o: Megan AsmusThe Sutton Law Firm, PC 150 Post Street, Suite 405 , San Francisco, CA 94108t: (415) 248-7825; f: belindavm@buellofficesf.com Here's some more exciting news. Our web site is up!!!! Check outwww.womencountpac.com <http://www.womencountpac.com/> . Thank you for your continuing support for this very important effort.Last but not least, below is a letter by Dr. Long that we'd like to sharewith you. Read it if you want to be moved into action! (NOTE: The lastparagraph of this letter has been omitted.) From: Dr. Lynette LongFirst I want to thank each and every one of you for writing to me. I wantto apologize for sending a group email, but I got hundreds of letters. Iwant you to know you are not alone. There are millions of women who feel asyou do, that the Democratic National Primary Campaign uncovered thepervasive and insidious sexism that runs rampant through our country. ThatHillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate, and that she is beingcheated out of the nomination by the good old boys network, the DNC and theMainstream Media. You are angry. You are in a rage. I am too. Underneath that rage is sadness, sadness that we are second class citizensin a country where we are the majority. What's especially disquieting to meis that many young women are blind to the sexist nature of the world inwhich we live. It's our job, each and every one of us, to educate them.Economically, women earn seventy-seven cents on the dollar for the same workcompared to men. Women are in significantly fewer managerial positions, areless likely to own a business and more likely to live in poverty.Politically, women comprise fifty-two percent of the population and an evenen larger share of the voting public yet only sixteen of the current onehundred Untied States Senators are women. Similarly, only sixteen percentof the current members of the House of Representatives are women. There isonly one female Supreme Court Justice on a nine member court and mostremarkably America has never had a female president or presidential nominee.Women did not get the right to vote in the United States until 1920. Theglass ceiling is real on both economical and political fronts. Men wantparity for their daughters and granddaughters but not for the women sittingbeside them. They are not going to give us the power that should be ours,we have to take it. Are we ready? Women have no sense of their own power. White women are the largestrace/gender voting block in the country. White men compose the secondlargest voting block, black women the third largest block, and black men arethe smallest race/gender block. White and black women together womencomprise more than fifty percent of the electorate and if were fullycommitted to a single candidate, we could determine the outcome of anyoffice in the country. It is our turn. Are we ready? I am sad that black women do not support Hillary in greater numbers. Manymembers of the black community wrote to me and said they were afraid tostand up for Hillary. They explained how black radio is pressuring it'slisteners to vote for Barack Obama. White men and women alike wrote me andtold me that they were called racist for supporting Hillary Clinton. I wantto remind each and everyone of you that, in 1969, Shirley Chisholm the firstblack woman to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives said, "Of my twohandicaps, being female put more obstacles in my path than being black."The impact of the "handicaps" of race and gender has not changed in the last40 years. As women we need to come together, and take the power that couldbe ours. Racism and sexism are both terrible barriers, but one is notworse than the other. On average, a black man with a college degree earnsmore than a white woman with the same degree, and a black woman earns lessthan both. Black male physicians earn more than white women physicians, andblack male professors earn more than white female professors. Yet ninetypercent of black women voted for Barack Obama indifferent to the impact ofgender on their struggle or how electing a female president might help them. I want to change the world. I think we can. I think by electing femaleleaders we can create a gentler America. We need to be counted. We needto stand up and let the DNC know we will not get in line. As one woman whowrote me so eloquently put it, the DNC thinks we will vote for Obama becauselike abused women we have nowhere else to go. To be removed from this list, please send an e-mail with "remove" in thesubject line.The Office of Susie Tompkins Buell & Mark BuellP.O. Box 29921San Francisco, CA 94129-9921t: 415.248.7820 f: 415.441.6381
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)